Skip to content
NatureHQ

Behaviour and cognitionbehaviour

Tool use

Not "which animals pick things up" — which ones pay a price now for a payoff later.

Tool use means acting on the environment with an object held or manipulated for the purpose. It is rarer than popular writing suggests, and the harder standard — modifying an object to make it work better — is rarer still.

Tool use was once offered as the thing that separated humans from everything else. It has not held up, but the retreat has been orderly rather than total: the animals that genuinely make and modify tools are still a short list, and they are scattered across the tree of life rather than clustered near us. A crow on a Pacific island, an octopus on Indonesian sand and an elephant in Nepal have nothing in common except that each pays a cost now for a benefit later. That cost is what separates tool use from opportunism, and it is the criterion this page applies.

Developed coverage · 68% complete · reviewed 2026-08-09

Quick facts

The useful distinction
Using an object, versus modifying one to work better
Why the cost matters
Carrying a shell slows an octopus down — that is what makes it a tool and not a shelter
Among crows
Two species out of roughly 45 use tools habitually

Where this appears

Every organism below has been linked to this page because the evidence links them. Each one carries its own evidence, and its own limits.

Definitions vary, but the working standard in the literature is close to this: an object, not attached to the substrate, held or carried and used to change the position or condition of something else. Two refinements do most of the work in practice.

  1. Manufacture. Shaping the object first — snapping a branch to length, bending a twig into a hook — is a considerably higher bar than using one as found.
  2. Cost. Carrying a tool to somewhere it might be needed, at a price paid now, is evidence that the behaviour is not simply opportunistic.

Neither criterion requires the animal to understand anything. They are behavioural standards, and an animal can meet them without holding a plan in any sense we would recognise.

Words used here
Tool manufacture
Modifying an object before use, rather than using it as found.

Every organism below has been linked to tool use because the evidence links it. Each carries its own evidence and its own scope, because the phrase "uses tools" means something quite different for a New Caledonian crow, which manufactures to a standard design, and for an octopus, which carries a found object.

  • Why do island species dominate the list of habitual tool users?

    Why it matters: Both tool-using crow species are island birds. If isolation, or an empty ecological niche, is what drives it, that says something general about how the behaviour arises.

  • How much tool use goes unrecorded because nobody has watched closely enough?

    Why it matters: Two of the clearest cases here — the coconut-carrying octopus and species-wide tool use in Hawaiian crows — were found only when someone looked properly.

The research behind this page

14 studies, newest first. Each one has a page explaining what it found and what it could not show.

2016Royal Society Open Science

Tool bending in New Caledonian crows

Birds routinely bent plant material while making tools, and hooked tools were produced as a matter of course rather than as a rare feat.

2016Nature

Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow

The great majority of adults used tools proficiently, and juveniles developed the behaviour without being taught, indicating a species-wide predisposition rather than an individually learned trick.

2014PLoS ONE

Using the Aesop’s Fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by New Caledonian crows

Crows chose sinking over floating objects, solid over hollow, and water over sand.

2012Current Biology

Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo

The bird spontaneously broke splinters from a wooden beam and used them to rake the nut within reach, then repeated and refined the behaviour, adjusting the material it selected and shaped.

2009Current Biology

Defensive tool use in a coconut-carrying octopus

Octopuses excavated, cleaned and carried coconut shell halves across the sea floor — walking awkwardly on stiffened arms while holding them — then assembled them into a shelter when threatened.

2009Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?

Crows that had learned to avoid the trap transferred correctly to versions that looked different but worked the same way, and failed on versions that looked the same but worked differently — but performance was inconsistent across individuals and tasks.

2008PLoS ONE

Why do dolphins carry sponges?

Sponging is concentrated in particular matrilines, is learned almost exclusively by daughters from their mothers, and lets dolphins forage in deep channels for fish that lack swim bladders and cannot be found by echolocation alone.

2005Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins

Nearly all spongers descended from a single matriline and shared a mitochondrial haplotype, with the pattern not explained by nuclear genetic relatedness or by habitat — consistent with vertical social transmission from mother to calf.

2005PLoS Biology

First Observation of Tool Use in Wild Gorillas

One female used a branch as a walking stick, apparently testing water depth ahead of her while wading.

2004American Journal of Primatology

Western gorilla diet: a synthesis from six sites

Western gorillas are substantially frugivorous where fruit is available, falling back on leaves, stems and pith when it is not.

2002Science

Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows

The bird bent straight wire into a hook and used it to lift the bucket out, repeatedly and in several variations.

2001Animal Behaviour

Cognitive behaviour in Asian elephants: use and modification of branches for fly switching

Elephants routinely shortened branches or removed side shoots to produce a more effective switch, and modified branches were associated with better fly control.

1999Nature

Cultures in chimpanzees

Thirty-nine behaviours, many of them involving tools, varied between sites in ways that ecology did not explain.

1996Nature

Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows

The birds manufacture two distinct tool types to a consistent design, including hooked twigs, and use them to winkle out grubs.

This page is a stop on a longer route

A guided journey reads several subjects in a deliberate order, with an argument for why one follows another. You can join in the middle.

Where to go from here

Each of these follows from something on this page — a relationship in the evidence, a claim people ask about, or the next mechanism along.

How complete this page is, and what it is still missing

NatureHQ publishes its own gaps. This page is at 68% completeness against what we would call a finished subject, and was last reviewed on 2026-08-09. It carries 9 claims and answers 14 mapped search questions.

  • 1 high-priority search intent(s) not yet covered
  • no research from the last few years is attached — check for newer work
  • more experiments could be explained in plain English
  • no popular claim about this subject has been checked yet
  • Primates, the most-studied tool users of all, are not yet represented as subjects.
  • Sea otters, dolphins and Egyptian vultures all belong here.