Skip to content
NatureHQ

Sources and licensing

Every study NatureHQ cites points at exactly one source, and every source records what may be done with it.

Bibliographic metadata, and NatureHQ’s own reading of the work. Full text is never reproduced. The pattern the site relies on is discover, verify, extract the factual intelligence, explain it independently, and cite — which only works if we can see, per source, what we are and are not permitted to do.

Of 370 studies, 342 carry an identifier confirmed against Crossref or OpenAlex. A DOI is attached only where an exact title, a matching author and an uncontradicted year all agree — a DOI that resolves to the wrong paper is worse than none, and the schema refuses to publish one that has not been checked.

Sources that may support a claim

Peer-reviewed research and authoritative reference bodies.

  • Nature Portfolio

    Peer-reviewed primary research and review articles across Nature, Nature Communications, Nature Ecology & Evolution and Nature Plants.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science

    Peer-reviewed primary research in Science and the open-access Science Advances.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    Peer-reviewed primary research, with a strong record in animal cognition and neuroscience.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Cell Press

    Peer-reviewed primary research across Current Biology, Cell and iScience.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Elsevier journals

    Peer-reviewed primary research including Animal Behaviour, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and the Trends series.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Springer journals

    Peer-reviewed primary research including Animal Cognition and Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • The Company of Biologists

    Peer-reviewed research in the Journal of Experimental Biology, a core source for sensory biology.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Public Library of Science

    Fully open-access peer-reviewed research; one of the few sources whose text NatureHQ could reuse if it ever needed to.

    Licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Full text: permitted with attribution · Attribution required

  • PeerJ

    Open-access peer-reviewed research with published peer-review history, which makes the review process itself inspectable.

    Licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Full text: permitted with attribution · Attribution required

  • eLife Sciences Publications

    Open-access peer-reviewed research that publishes editorial assessments and reviews alongside the paper, so the strength of a result can be read rather than assumed. A useful home for replications and negative results.

    Licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Full text: permitted with attribution · Attribution required

  • Wiley journals

    Peer-reviewed research including Ecology Letters and New Phytologist.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • The Royal Society

    Peer-reviewed research in Proceedings B and Biology Letters.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Government science agencies

    Research documents and advisory reports from national agencies — fisheries, wildlife, geological surveys. Often the only published home for decades-long population monitoring, and usually absent from Crossref, so records sourced here are expected to stay without a DOI rather than to be pending one.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: restricted · Attribution required

  • De Gruyter journals

    Peer-reviewed research in long-established specialist journals, notably Mammalia for mammalogy. Narrow use: NatureHQ holds this source for findings that have no home in the larger publishers already covered.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Brill journals

    Peer-reviewed research in long-established specialist journals, notably Behaviour for ethology. Narrow use, as with De Gruyter: held for findings that have no home in the larger publishers already covered.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • University press journals

    Peer-reviewed journals published by university presses — The Biological Bulletin, The American Naturalist, Behavioral Ecology and others. Distinct from source:university-press-offices, which covers institutional press releases and is not a source of truth.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Annual Reviews

    Commissioned review journals. Useful where NatureHQ needs the settled state of a field rather than a single result — and treated as synthesis, never as the primary evidence for a specific finding.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • JAMA Network

    Medical literature; relevant to NatureHQ where comparative biology meets human medicine.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Academic book publishers

    Scholarly monographs that consolidate a research programme, such as von Frisch on the honey-bee dance language. Cited for what they established; superseded on any point where later research disagrees.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: prohibited · Attribution required

  • Public-domain scientific works

    Historical monographs out of copyright, such as Darwin and von Frisch. Used for the history of a subject, never as current evidence.

    Licence: Public Domain · Full text: permitted

  • bioRxiv

    Preprints. Legitimate evidence, but never presentable as established: anything from here carries preprint status through to the reader.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: restricted · Attribution required

  • Global Biodiversity Information Facility

    Species occurrence records. Authoritative for distribution, with the caveat that occurrence data reflect where people looked as much as where animals are.

    Licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Full text: restricted · Attribution required

  • Catalogue of Life

    Consensus taxonomic backbone. The intended authority for scientific names and classification.

    Licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Full text: permitted with attribution · Attribution required

  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

    The authority for conservation status. Assessments are dated and taxon-specific, and NatureHQ records both alongside the category.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: restricted · Attribution required

  • National and international public health agencies

    The authority for what a member of the public should actually do about a health risk from an animal — rabies exposure above all. NatureHQ summarises the shape of that guidance and its jurisdictional variation, and never restates a dose, a schedule or a treatment decision. Those belong to a clinician with the patient in front of them.

    Licence: not stated · Full text: restricted · Attribution required

Sources that may not support a claim

Useful for finding research or gauging attention. Never the scientific basis of anything.

News media tells us what people are reading, and therefore what they are about to search for. University press offices tell us a study exists and is getting attention; they routinely overstate it, so the underlying paper is always located first. Bibliographic registers establish that a paper exists and what it is called, not what it found. The schema will not let any of them be marked as a scientific source of truth.

  • Crossref

    DOI registration and bibliographic metadata. The intended resolver for verifying NatureHQ study identifiers; it establishes that a paper exists and what it is called, not what it found.

  • OpenAlex

    Open bibliographic graph covering works, authors and citations. Intended for discovering related and superseding research during enrichment.

  • Europe PMC

    Literature search across life-science journals and preprints, including retraction and correction notices — the mechanism by which NatureHQ would learn a cited paper had been withdrawn.

  • University and institutional press offices

    Discovery signal: press releases tell us a study exists and is getting attention. They routinely overstate it, so the underlying paper is always located before anything is written.

  • Science and news media

    Demand and trend evidence only: what people are reading, and therefore what they are about to search for. Never the scientific basis of a claim.