Skip to content
NatureHQ

Nature intelligence

You heard something interesting about nature.Here is what we actually know.

NatureHQ answers the question you arrived with, then shows you what the evidence actually demonstrates — which species it was really about, what the experiment could and could not show, and where scientists still disagree.

Things people have heard

A headline, a documentary, a post from a friend. Each of these takes the popular version apart and shows what the evidence supports — including when the honest answer is that researchers do not agree.

Claim check

Mostly supported

Do legumes add nitrogen to the soil?

The fixing is real, and the destination is the plant rather than the ground. Soil gains when nodules, roots and eventually the whole plant decompose — so how much a soil ends up with depends on whether the plant stays in it.

Where you may have met it: gardening and growing adviceRead on

Read something

All 62 subjects

Animals, plants, fungi and the rest

A deliberately small set, built in depth. Every page here says what it is still missing, which is the part a catalogue never tells you.

How anybody knows

The experiments underneath

Almost every strong result in this field comes down to one clever manipulation: play the sound when the animal is not there, label the water and see where the label ends up, follow the insect with radar instead of guessing. These are three of them, told as what somebody actually did.

Every experiment on NatureHQ carries a field called what it does not show, and it is required rather than optional. How we read evidence

Take the long way

All guided journeys

Guided journeys

Some of these pages are much better read in a particular order. Each route is written as an argument for why one page follows another, rather than assembled from whatever happens to be nearby.

Across species

All 129 in Explore

Questions that are not about one animal

Which animals use tools? What counts as culture? These pages are assembled from the same evidence as the subject pages, arranged by ability or mechanism rather than by organism — so a crow, a bee and a carnivorous plant can appear side by side.

The evidence layer

Latest discoveries

Recent research we have read

Not a news feed. Each of these has a page explaining what it found, what its authors concluded, and how far we think the result can actually be pushed.

How NatureHQ is built

Every claim carries its evidence, the species it was actually shown in, and an honest note about how far it can be pushed. We would rather have a small number of subjects worth reading than a catalogue of thin pages — which is why the numbers below are at the bottom of this page rather than the top of it. They describe how much has been built. They do not describe how much there is to know, and no page here claims to be finished.

Subjects
191, each publishing its own gaps
Claims
614 backed by at least one study
Research
720 studies read and summarised
Open questions
761 recorded rather than smoothed over

How we work · Evidence standards · Where our sources come from