Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts

Welbergen, J. A.; Davies, N. B.

Behavioral Ecology, 2011

Peer-reviewedfield experimentwild

Mounted models were presented at wild reed warbler nests: a cuckoo, a sparrowhawk, and a harmless control, together with manipulated models in which barring on the underparts was altered. Host mobbing responses were scored, and responses to the barred and unbarred versions compared.

Studied in
Cuculus canorus, Accipiter nisus, Acrocephalus scirpaceus
Sample size
model presentations at wild host nests

Hosts mobbed the cuckoo less than the control, and manipulating the barred underparts changed the response: models with hawk-like barring elicited less mobbing than the same models without it.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

The cuckoo’s resemblance to a sparrowhawk functions to reduce host attack, with the barred plumage a key element of the effect.

How NatureHQ reads it

A clean demonstration that a resemblance can be tested rather than asserted. The question is never whether a cuckoo looks like a hawk to us; it is whether the specified receiver — a reed warbler deciding whether to attack — behaves differently, and whether removing the feature removes the effect. Both were measured.

  • Mounted models cannot reproduce flight, which is likely part of the resemblance.
  • Reduced mobbing is a benefit; whether it is the origin of the plumage rather than a later use is not established by this design.
  • A stuffed cuckoo with the barring changed

    Cuckoos are said to resemble sparrowhawks. Does that resemblance change what a host does?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: University press journalsPublished in a university press journal.

doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr008

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.