Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Sperm whale codas

Watkins, William A.; Schevill, William E.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977

Peer-reviewedfield observationwild

Sperm whale vocalisations were recorded at sea with hydrophone arrays that allowed individual callers to be separated, and the patterned click sequences produced during social contact were described and classified for the first time.

Studied in
Physeter macrocephalus
Sample size
recordings from wild sperm whale groups

Sperm whales produce stereotyped, patterned sequences of clicks — named codas — distinct from the regular clicking used for echolocation. Codas are exchanged between animals in social contexts, often overlapping or alternating, and individual whales repeat particular patterns.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Codas are a category of social vocalisation distinct in structure and context from foraging clicks.

How NatureHQ reads it

The founding observation for everything that followed, and the distinction it draws is the one to hold on to: a sperm whale's ordinary clicking is a sonar pulse train aimed at finding squid, and a coda is a short rhythmic pattern produced while socialising. Confusing the two is the commonest error in popular coverage — the enormous source levels people quote belong to the echolocation clicks, and the "conversations" belong to the codas, which are far quieter. Almost fifty years on, the classification here is still the basis of the field.

  • Early recordings with limited ability to attribute calls to identified individuals.
  • Small number of groups, in a limited geographic area.
  • Description of structure carries no information about function or meaning.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: University press journalsPublished in a university press journal.

doi.org/10.1121/1.381678

This reference was resolved automatically against Crossref on 2026-08-11.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-08-11.