Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Imprinting to Chemical Cues: The Basis for Home Stream Selection in Salmon

Scholz, Allan T.; Horrall, Ross M.; Cooper, Jon C.; Hasler, Arthur D.

Science, 1976

Peer-reviewedfield experimentmixed

Hatchery salmon were exposed to a synthetic chemical — morpholine — during the smolt stage, released, and eighteen months later streams were scented with the same chemical during the spawning run while recaptures were counted at scented and unscented sites.

Studied in
Oncorhynchus kisutch
Sample size
hatchery coho salmon exposed to a synthetic odorant as smolts

Salmon exposed as smolts returned overwhelmingly to the stream scented with that chemical, while unexposed controls did not.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Salmon imprint on the chemical composition of their home water during a sensitive period as smolts, and use that memory to select a stream as adults.

How NatureHQ reads it

The experiment that turned Hasler’s hypothesis into a demonstration, and did it by substituting an odour no stream contains — which is what makes it decisive. A fish returning to morpholine is not returning to a place; it is returning to a smell it learned, and the two had never been separable before.

  • A single synthetic compound stands in for natural stream odour, which is a mixture nobody has fully characterised.
  • Hatchery fish, released as a group; wild imprinting may differ in timing and in what is learned.
  • Explains the final stream choice, not how a salmon crosses an ocean to reach the right coast.
  • Teaching salmon a smell that exists in no river

    Do salmon return to a place, or to a smell they learned there? The two are impossible to separate — unless you supply a smell no place has.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: American Association for the Advancement of SciencePublished in Science or Science Advances (AAAS).

doi.org/10.1126/science.1273590

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.