Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Body temperature of the camel and its relation to water economy

Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut; Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil; Jarnum, Sven A.; Houpt, Thomas R.

American Journal of Physiology, 1957

Peer-reviewedfield experimentwild

Measured body temperature continuously through the day in camels in the Sahara, comparing watered animals with dehydrated ones, and calculated the water saved by the observed temperature swing.

Studied in
Camelus dromedarius
Sample size
camels measured in the Sahara, watered and dehydrated

A dehydrated camel allows its body temperature to swing by around six degrees across the day — cooling overnight and rising through the morning without sweating — and re-radiates the stored heat at night. A watered camel holds a much steadier temperature. The swing saves several litres of water a day.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Permitting body temperature to fluctuate is a water-conservation mechanism, deployed when water is short and abandoned when it is not.

How NatureHQ reads it

The measurement behind the correction that camels do not store water in their humps. The hump is fat. The actual mechanism is the opposite of storage: it is declining to spend, by letting the body heat up instead of sweating, and it is switched on only when the animal is short of water.

  • A small number of animals under field conditions in the 1950s.
  • The magnitude of the swing varies with the degree of dehydration and with ambient conditions.
  • The same camels, with water and without

    Camels are famously heat-tolerant. Is the tolerance a fixed property of the animal, or something it deploys when it needs to?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Learned society journalsPublished in a learned society journal.

doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.188.1.103

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.