Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation

Schluter, Dolph

Science, 1994

Peer-reviewedfield experimentsemi natural

Generalist sticklebacks were placed in experimental ponds, half of them alongside a specialist competitor that feeds on open-water plankton and half without. Growth of individual generalists was measured against their body form, so that the fitness consequence of resembling the competitor could be estimated directly.

Studied in
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Sample size
experimental pond populations with and without a competitor

With the competitor present, generalists resembling it grew more slowly, while those differing from it grew better. Without the competitor, that relationship disappeared.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Competition generates selection against similarity, which is the mechanism divergent character displacement requires.

How NatureHQ reads it

This closes the gap the warbler study leaves open. Observing that similar species differ where they overlap is consistent with competition and consistent with several other things. Here the competitor is present or absent by design, and the penalty for resembling it is measured on individual fish — so the selection is observed rather than inferred from a pattern.

  • Experimental ponds over one growing season, not a long-term evolutionary trajectory.
  • Growth is a component of fitness rather than the whole of it, and reproduction was not measured.
  • Measuring what it costs to resemble your competitor

    Similar species often differ more where they overlap. Does competition actually push them apart, or does that pattern have another explanation?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: American Association for the Advancement of SciencePublished in Science or Science Advances (AAAS).

doi.org/10.1126/science.266.5186.798

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-04.