Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Evidence for Geomagnetic Imprinting as a Homing Mechanism in Pacific Salmon

Putman, Nathan F.; Lohmann, Kenneth J.; Putman, Emily M.; Quinn, Thomas P.; Klimley, A. Peter; Noakes, David L. G.

Current Biology, 2013

Peer-reviewedcomparative studywild

Compared which side of Vancouver Island returning sockeye used each year with the drift of the geomagnetic field at the two possible entrances, over more than half a century of fishery records.

Studied in
Oncorhynchus nerka
Sample size
fifty-six years of fishery records for returning sockeye salmon

The proportion of fish using each route tracked which entrance more closely matched the magnetic signature present when that cohort left the river as juveniles.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Salmon imprint on the magnetic signature of their natal region and use it to return to the right stretch of coast, with olfactory cues taking over close to the river.

How NatureHQ reads it

The record that completes the salmon answer without displacing the old one. Smell explains the last few kilometres and cannot explain the first three thousand, because a river’s odour does not reach the open Pacific. Two mechanisms, two scales, and the popular version keeps only the second.

  • Correlational, from fishery catch data rather than tracked individuals.
  • Other things that vary with the field over decades — temperature, currents — are hard to exclude entirely.
  • One species, one island, one set of entrances.
  • Fifty-six years of salmon catches, and which way round an island they came

    If smell only works near the river, what brings a salmon back to the right coast after years in the open ocean?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Cell PressPublished in a Cell Press journal.

doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.041

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.