Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Spatial pattern enhances ecosystem functioning in an African savanna

Pringle, Robert M.; Doak, Daniel F.; Brody, Alison K.; Jocqué, Rudy; Palmer, Todd M.

PLoS Biology, 2010

Peer-reviewedfield observationwild

Termite mounds across an African savanna were mapped and their spatial arrangement analysed, and plant productivity, plant reproduction and animal abundance were measured with distance from mounds and across the landscape as a whole.

Studied in
Odontotermes, Plantae, Animalia
Sample size
mapped termite mounds across savanna with associated surveys

Mounds were regularly rather than randomly spaced, and productivity, plant reproduction and animal abundance were elevated near them. Because the regular spacing distributed those elevated patches evenly, landscape-scale productivity exceeded what the same number of randomly placed mounds would produce.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

The spatial arrangement of engineered patches, not merely their presence, enhances ecosystem functioning at landscape scale.

How NatureHQ reads it

A result about geometry, which is unusual and genuinely surprising. The mounds enrich soil locally, which is the expected part. What is not expected is that the pattern matters independently of the number: evenly spaced mounds put enriched patches within reach of more of the landscape than the same mounds clustered would. It is a rare case where a spatial arrangement is itself doing ecological work.

  • Observational; mound placement was not manipulated, and the regular spacing has its own causes.
  • One savanna system and one termite genus; the landscape effect depends on the surrounding vegetation.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Public Library of SciencePublished in a PLOS journal under CC BY 4.0.

doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000377

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-04.