Study
Wood frog adaptations to overwintering in Alaska: new limits to freezing tolerance
Larson, Don J.; Middle, Lorien; Vu, Henry; Zhang, Wenqing; Serianni, Anthony S.; Duman, John; Barnes, Brian M.
Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014
Followed wood frogs through natural Alaskan winters in their own overwintering sites, measuring body temperature, the repeated freeze–thaw cycles they experienced, and the cryoprotectant concentrations they accumulated.
- Studied in
- Lithobates sylvaticus
- Sample size
- frogs overwintering in natural Alaskan hibernacula
Alaskan wood frogs survived far lower temperatures and longer freezing than laboratory work had established, accumulating much higher glucose concentrations, and the repeated partial thaws of autumn appeared to drive that accumulation.
What it means
The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.
How the authors put it
Natural overwintering conditions produce greater freeze tolerance than laboratory protocols, because the sequence of freeze–thaw cycles is itself part of the preparation.
How NatureHQ reads it
A useful correction to a laboratory-derived limit, and a good illustration of a general point: an animal tested in a tidy protocol may be less capable than the same animal in the messy conditions it evolved in. It also underlines that the tolerance is prepared rather than permanent.
- Field measurement means less control over exposure, so the relationship between the freeze–thaw cycling and the glucose accumulation is inferred rather than manipulated.
- One population at the northern edge of the range; other populations are less cold-hardy.
Letting the winter do the experiment
Laboratory work established how much freezing a wood frog survives. Do frogs in an actual Alaskan winter match it?
What this study is used for on NatureHQ
One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.
Published by: The Company of BiologistsPublished by The Company of Biologists.
Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.
NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.