Study
Oddity and the confusion effect in predation
Landeau, Laurie; Terborgh, John
Animal Behaviour, 1986
Let largemouth bass hunt shoals of silvery minnows at a range of shoal sizes, and separately introduced a small number of visually distinct individuals — dyed blue — into otherwise uniform shoals.
- Studied in
- Micropterus salmoides, Notemigonus crysoleucas
- Sample size
- bass hunting shoals of varying size and composition
Bass capture success fell sharply as shoal size increased, and rose again when odd-looking individuals were present. The odd individuals were taken far out of proportion to their numbers, and their presence improved the predator’s success against the shoal as a whole.
What it means
The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.
How the authors put it
The confusion effect is real and depends on the prey being visually uniform; a single distinguishable individual restores the predator’s ability to target.
How NatureHQ reads it
The experiment that gives "safety in numbers" a mechanism and a condition. Confusion is not about being one of many — it is about being indistinguishable from many, which is why oddity is so heavily penalised and why shoaling fish are so uniform.
- One predator and one prey species in a tank, where escape options are limited.
- Dyeing individuals changes appearance in a way that may exaggerate natural variation.
Dyeing a few fish blue
Predators do worse against larger shoals. Is that because there are more prey to share the risk, or because many similar targets are genuinely harder to catch?
What this study is used for on NatureHQ
One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.
Group defence
A group helps in three separate ways: your share of the risk falls, targeting gets harder for the predator, and you can put somebody between yourself and it. Only the second needs the group to look alike.
Group defence
A predator’s success drops sharply against a large shoal — until a few individuals look different. Odd ones are taken far out of proportion, and their presence restores the predator’s success against the whole group.
Published by: Elsevier journalsPublished in an Elsevier journal.
doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80208-1
Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.
NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.