Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Eurasian Reed Warblers Compensate for Virtual Magnetic Displacement

Kishkinev, Dmitry; Chernetsov, Nikita; Pakhomov, Alexander; Heyers, Dominik; Mouritsen, Henrik

Current Biology, 2015

Peer-reviewedcontrolled laboratory experimentlaboratory

Adult reed warblers were tested in orientation cages while coils reproduced the magnetic field of a site roughly a thousand kilometres away, with the birds themselves never moved.

Studied in
Acrocephalus scirpaceus
Sample size
adult reed warblers tested in orientation cages inside magnetic coils

Birds shifted their headings in the direction that would compensate for the displacement the simulated field implied, despite no other cue having changed.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Magnetic information alone can supply positional information to an experienced migrant — a magnetic map rather than only a magnetic compass.

How NatureHQ reads it

The experiment that separates a magnetic map from a magnetic compass more sharply than any other, because nothing moved: only the field was changed, and the birds behaved as though they had been carried. It is also the reason NatureHQ does not say that every magnetoreceptive animal has a map — this is one of very few species where the map half has been shown at all.

  • Adults only, and adults with route experience; the result says nothing about first-year birds.
  • Cage headings rather than a journey, and a single population.
  • Moving the magnetic field instead of the bird

    If a bird corrects for being carried a thousand kilometres, is the magnetic field enough on its own to tell it that it has been?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Cell PressPublished in a Cell Press journal.

doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.012

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.