Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

The electric sense of sharks and rays

Kalmijn, Adrianus J.

Journal of Experimental Biology, 1971

Peer-reviewedcontrolled laboratory experimentcaptive

Sharks and rays were presented with live flatfish buried in sand, with the same fish buried inside an agar chamber that blocked odour but passed electric fields, and with electrodes reproducing the fish’s bioelectric field with no fish present.

Studied in
Scyliorhinus canicula, Raja clavata
Sample size
behavioural trials with buried prey and electrode substitutes

Predators attacked the agar-covered fish and the bare electrodes as readily as the buried fish, and preferred the electrodes to a source of fish odour, showing that the final strike is guided by weak bioelectric fields.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Sharks and rays detect the minute electric fields produced by living animals and use them to locate hidden prey at close range.

How NatureHQ reads it

The electrode condition is what makes this decisive: an animal attacking a pair of wires that smell of nothing is not responding to anything but the field. The result also fixes the *range* of the sense, which popular accounts routinely inflate — electroreception works over centimetres, not miles, and it takes over at the end of a hunt that smell and hearing began.

  • Two small benthic species; sensitivity and use vary widely across sharks.
  • Tank conditions have unusually low electrical noise compared with the open sea.
  • Establishes detection and orientation, not the neural mechanism.
  • Sharks attacking a pair of wires

    Sharks find prey buried in sand where they cannot see or smell it. What are they detecting?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: The Company of BiologistsPublished by The Company of Biologists.

doi.org/10.1242/jeb.55.2.371

This reference was resolved automatically against Crossref on 2026-08-11.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-08-09.