Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Exaptation — a missing term in the science of form

Gould, Stephen Jay; Vrba, Elisabeth S.

Paleobiology, 1982

Peer-reviewednarrative reviewmixed

Proposes a term for a feature that is currently useful for something other than what selection originally built it for, distinguishing it from an adaptation in the strict historical sense.

Studied in
Animalia
Sample size
conceptual paper

Current utility and evolutionary origin are separate questions, and a large fraction of useful traits were co-opted rather than built for the job they now do.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

The vocabulary of adaptation needs a term for co-option, because without one every useful feature gets described as though selection produced it for its present use.

How NatureHQ reads it

Cited on the survival pages because so many extreme-tolerance mechanisms are co-options. The proteins that let a tardigrade dry out, the sugars that protect a frozen frog, the haemoglobin variants of high-altitude birds — several of these have ordinary jobs elsewhere and were recruited, which is a different story from being built for the extreme.

  • Conceptual rather than empirical, and distinguishing an adaptation from an exaptation for any given trait requires historical evidence that is often unavailable.
  • The terminology is not universally adopted.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: University press journalsPublished in a university press journal.

doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300004310

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.