Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Metabolic rate and body temperature reduction during hibernation and daily torpor

Geiser, Fritz

Annual Review of Physiology, 2004

Peer-reviewednarrative reviewmixed

A comparative review of measured metabolic rates and body temperatures across species that use daily torpor and species that hibernate, examining whether the two are points on one continuum or physiologically distinct states.

Studied in
Mammalia, Aves
Sample size
comparative review across heterothermic mammals and birds

Hibernation and daily torpor differ quantitatively in every measured dimension: bout length, minimum body temperature and the depth of metabolic suppression, which in deep hibernators falls to a few per cent of basal rate. Metabolic suppression is not simply a passive consequence of cooling — it begins before body temperature falls and is actively regulated.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Torpor and hibernation form a continuum of controlled heterothermy rather than two unrelated phenomena, but the extremes are far enough apart to warrant separate terms.

How NatureHQ reads it

The active-suppression finding is the one that dismantles the intuitive picture. It is tempting to think a hibernating animal is cold and therefore slow — physics doing the work. The measurements say the animal turns its metabolism down first and the temperature follows, which makes hibernation a regulated state an animal enters rather than a condition it succumbs to.

  • Comparative data are dominated by small mammals that hibernate conveniently in laboratories.
  • Field metabolic measurements are far scarcer than laboratory ones and tend to be higher.
  • Where exactly to draw the boundary between deep daily torpor and shallow hibernation remains a matter of convention.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Wiley journalsPublished in a Wiley journal.

doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032102.115105

This reference was resolved automatically against Crossref on 2026-08-11.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-08-10.