Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

The function of bilateral odor arrival time differences in olfactory orientation of sharks

Gardiner, Jayne M.; Atema, Jelle

Current Biology, 2010

Peer-reviewedcontrolled laboratory experimentlaboratory

Sharks were fitted with apparatus that delivered an odour pulse to each nostril separately, with the delay between the two sides controlled. The direction the animal turned was recorded against which nostril received the odour first and by how much.

Studied in
Mustelus canis
Sample size
smooth dogfish fitted with headgear delivering odour to each nostril independently

Sharks turned towards the side that received the odour first, for delays of roughly a tenth of a second down to a fraction of that, and did not respond to differences in concentration between the two sides.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Sharks steer in an odour plume by comparing the arrival time at the two nostrils, not by comparing concentration.

How NatureHQ reads it

The result that replaces the standard picture of smell-tracking. Everybody assumes an animal compares how strong the smell is on each side and turns towards the stronger — and a real plume is a turbulent mess of filaments in which concentration at any instant carries almost no directional information. Timing does. This is the same solution ears use for locating sound, applied to chemistry, and it explains how a shark can hold a heading in water where the concentration gradient is nonsense.

  • One species, restrained and instrumented, which constrains natural swimming.
  • Establishes the cue used for steering, not the distance over which a plume can be followed.
  • Concentration comparison may still contribute at very different timescales.
  • Delivering a smell to one shark nostril a fraction of a second before the other

    A shark following a scent has to decide which way to turn. Is it comparing how strong the smell is on each side?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Cell PressPublished in a Cell Press journal.

doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.053

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-02.