Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Tracking of Arctic terns Sterna paradisaea reveals longest animal migration

Egevang, Carsten; Stenhouse, Iain J.; Phillips, Richard A.; Petersen, Aevar; Fox, James W.; Silk, Janet R. D.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010

Peer-reviewedfield observationwild

Arctic terns breeding in Greenland and Iceland were fitted with miniature light-level geolocators, which were recovered when the birds returned the following season, and their annual routes reconstructed.

Studied in
Sterna paradisaea
Sample size
Arctic terns carrying light-level geolocators, recovered the following year

Birds followed a winding route with an extended stopover in the North Atlantic and a southbound track down either the African or the South American side, covering annual distances far greater than the straight-line pole-to-pole distance.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

The Arctic tern makes the longest known annual migration of any animal, and its route is structured by winds and productive ocean areas rather than being direct.

How NatureHQ reads it

Cited as much for the shape of the route as for the record. The pre-tracking figure was a straight-line estimate, and the real route is longer and much less direct — which is why NatureHQ states annual distance from tracks rather than repeating a distance between two points.

  • Geolocators must be recovered, so the sample is restricted to birds that survived and returned to the same colony.
  • Light-level geolocation gives positions accurate to roughly a hundred kilometres, and fails near the equinoxes.
  • Two colonies; other populations may travel differently.
  • Waiting a year to find out where the bird went

    How far does an Arctic tern actually travel in a year — measured, rather than estimated?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPublished in PNAS.

doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909493107

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.