Study
Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: one function of mobbing
Curio, Eberhard; Ernst, Ulrich; Vieth, Wolfgang
Science, 1978
Arranged blackbirds in adjacent cages so that a "teacher" bird could see a stuffed owl while an "observer" bird, seeing only the teacher, was shown a harmless object — a honeyeater, and in some trials a plastic bottle. The observer therefore saw mobbing directed at what it believed was the harmless object. Observers were then themselves used as teachers for further birds.
- Studied in
- Turdus merula
- Sample size
- blackbirds in a paired-cage apparatus with chained transmission
Observer birds began mobbing the harmless object, and passed that response on to further birds through a chain of several individuals, with the acquired response persisting through the transmission chain.
What it means
The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.
How the authors put it
Enemy recognition can be culturally transmitted through mobbing, and an incorrect association can propagate through a population.
How NatureHQ reads it
One of the most elegant experiments in behavioural biology, and the reason NatureHQ can say that predator recognition is partly learned socially rather than only inherited. The deliberately false association is what makes it decisive: the birds are not responding to anything real about the bottle, so the response can only have come from watching another bird.
- Captive birds in an artificial apparatus, and the transmission chain is shorter than a real population.
- Shows that a false association can propagate without establishing how commonly this happens in the wild.
Teaching blackbirds to mob a bottle
Do birds inherit knowledge of what a predator looks like, or learn it from each other — and if they learn it, can they learn something false?
What this study is used for on NatureHQ
One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.
Published by: American Association for the Advancement of SciencePublished in Science or Science Advances (AAAS).
doi.org/10.1126/science.202.4370.899
Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.
NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.