Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity

Chesson, Peter

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000

Peer-reviewedsystematic reviewnot applicable

Organises coexistence mechanisms into those that stabilise — making each species recover when rare, because it limits itself more than it limits others — and those that merely equalise, reducing fitness differences without producing that self-limitation.

Sample size
theoretical synthesis across coexistence mechanisms

Stable coexistence requires that intraspecific competition exceed interspecific competition. Mechanisms achieving this include resource partitioning, environmental fluctuation combined with differing responses, and spatial variation with limited dispersal.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Coexistence questions become tractable when phrased as whether a species can increase when rare, rather than as whether two species are similar.

How NatureHQ reads it

The framework that replaces "they must divide the resource somehow" with something testable. Its most useful single idea for a general reader is that coexistence is not about being different enough — it is about each species being its own worst enemy, held back more by its own kind than by the other.

  • Theoretical synthesis; applying it to a particular field system requires measurements that are often unavailable.
  • Distinguishing stabilising from equalising mechanisms empirically remains difficult.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Annual ReviewsPublished in an Annual Reviews journal.

doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-04.