Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Underwater "sniffing" by semi-aquatic mammals

Catania, Kenneth C.

Nature, 2006

Peer-reviewedcontrolled laboratory experimentlaboratory

Filmed star-nosed moles and water shrews foraging underwater at high speed, recording the exhalation and re-inhalation of air bubbles against the substrate and against scented and unscented targets, and tested trail-following performance with the behaviour prevented.

Studied in
Condylura cristata, Sorex palustris
Sample size
star-nosed moles and water shrews filmed foraging underwater

The animals exhaled air bubbles onto objects and re-inhaled them at rates of up to about ten times a second, and followed scent trails underwater successfully; performance dropped when bubble behaviour was prevented.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Semi-aquatic mammals smell underwater by using exhaled air bubbles to carry odour molecules from an object back into the nose.

How NatureHQ reads it

Included because it demolishes a piece of received wisdom that sounds like physics: mammals cannot smell underwater, because olfaction requires air. They can, by bringing the air with them. It is also a good illustration of why high-speed film changed sensory biology — at normal speed the behaviour looks like nothing at all, and the whole phenomenon is invisible without the frame rate.

  • Two species, both with unusual foraging ecology; the behaviour is not general to mammals.
  • Laboratory tanks rather than natural burrow and stream conditions.
  • Establishes that odour is transferred; how much information the animal extracts is not quantified.
  • Filming a mole blowing bubbles at things underwater

    Mammals are supposed to be unable to smell underwater, because smelling requires air. So how does a semi-aquatic mole follow a scent trail in a stream?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Nature PortfolioPublished in a Nature Portfolio journal.

doi.org/10.1038/4441024a

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-02.