Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Evidence for Geomagnetic Imprinting and Magnetic Navigation in the Natal Homing of Sea Turtles

Brothers, J. Roger; Lohmann, Kenneth J.

Current Biology, 2015

Peer-reviewedcomparative studywild

Compared nesting densities along the east Florida coast with the natural year-to-year drift of the geomagnetic field, testing whether nesting shifted with the field.

Studied in
Caretta caretta
Sample size
nineteen years of loggerhead nesting records along the Florida coast

Where magnetic signatures of adjacent coastal areas converged over time, nesting density increased; where they diverged, it decreased.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Turtles imprint on the magnetic signature of their natal beach and return to the coastline carrying that signature, rather than to a fixed geographic point.

How NatureHQ reads it

The record that makes "turtles return to the beach where they were born" precise enough to be interesting. It is correlational — nobody imprinted a turtle experimentally and waited twenty years — and the correlation is with a moving field rather than with a place, which is a stronger and stranger claim than the popular version.

  • Correlational, at population level: no individual turtle was followed from hatching to nesting.
  • One species on one coast, where the field drifts unusually informatively.
  • Field drift and other coastal changes are not fully separable over nineteen years.
  • Nineteen years of turtle nests, against a field that will not stay still

    If turtles imprint on the magnetic signature of their birthplace, what happens when that signature drifts along the coast?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Cell PressPublished in a Cell Press journal.

doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.035

Checked against Crossref on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-03.