Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Culture and cultural evolution in birds: a review of the evidence

Aplin, Lucy M.

Animal Behaviour, 2019

Peer-reviewednarrative reviewmixed

Reviews evidence for socially transmitted behaviour in birds across song, foraging, migration and nest construction, and assesses which cases meet the standards required to call a behavioural difference cultural rather than genetic or environmental.

Studied in
Aves
Sample size
synthesis of avian social learning and cultural transmission studies

Song is by a wide margin the best-evidenced avian culture, with experimental support from tutoring, isolation and population-level tracking. Non-vocal traditions are established in a smaller number of systems, most robustly through the seeded puzzle-box experiments in great tits.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Birds show cultural transmission across several behavioural domains, and vocal culture in songbirds is the strongest comparative case for cultural evolution outside humans.

How NatureHQ reads it

Useful for placing birdsong correctly. The popular framing puts primates and cetaceans at the centre of any argument about animal culture; on the evidence, the best case is a sparrow. Song is learned, socially acquired, geographically structured, historically traceable and experimentally manipulable, which is a combination no primate tradition offers. That it is a signal rather than a technology is exactly why it is so tractable — it leaves a recording.

  • A review, dependent on the quality of the studies it aggregates.
  • The criteria for calling a behaviour cultural are contested, and different authors would include or exclude different cases.
  • Song is over-represented partly because it is easy to record, which is a bias in the evidence base as well as a strength.

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Elsevier journalsPublished in an Elsevier journal.

doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.001

Checked against Crossref and OpenAlex on 2026-09-28, and they agree on the title, the authors and the year.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-09-02.