Skip to content
NatureHQ

Study

Aging in a long-lived clonal tree

Ally, D.; Ritland, K.; Otto, S. P.

PLoS Biology, 2010

Peer-reviewedfield observationwild

Aspen clones — genetically identical stands spreading from a single individual — were sized and dated by genetic methods, and pollen viability was measured across clones of different estimated age.

Studied in
Populus tremuloides
Sample size
aspen clones of differing estimated ages

Older, larger clones produced markedly less viable pollen. Reproductive performance declined with the age of the genetic individual even though the stems themselves were young.

What it means

The authors' reading, and ours. Where they differ, that difference is the point.

How the authors put it

Somatic mutations accumulate over the life of a clone and degrade its reproductive function, so a clonal lineage ages even while continually producing new stems.

How NatureHQ reads it

The finding that makes "oldest living organism" claims tractable. A clone can keep replacing its stems indefinitely, so it has no obvious upper age — but it is not unchanged: mutations pile up in the shared genome, and something measurable gets worse. So there are two honest answers to how old a clonal tree is, one about the stem and one about the lineage, and this shows the lineage is not simply exempt from time.

  • Clone ages are estimated from size and growth rate, with wide uncertainty.
  • One species; the rate of somatic mutation accumulation will differ elsewhere.
  • Shows a decline in pollen viability, not the full reproductive or survival consequence.
  • Asking how old a forest of one tree is

    Does a clonal tree that keeps growing new stems escape ageing altogether?

What this study is used for on NatureHQ

One study can inform several subjects. Here is everywhere this one is cited.

Published by: Public Library of SciencePublished in a PLOS journal under CC BY 4.0.

doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000454

This reference was resolved automatically against Crossref and OpenAlex on 2026-08-30.

NatureHQ summarises research in its own words and does not reproduce published text. Reviewed 2026-08-30.